Lead paint was banned in 1978 to reduce the risk of lead poisoning in children who might ingest paint chips or breathe in lead dust. But in Baltimore, a prominent medical institute conducting research from 1993 to 1999 on the toxic impact of lead, allegedly placed more than 100 children in grave danger of lead in order to determine the effectiveness of a lead abatement program.

According to the class action suit filed last week, the Kennedy Krieger Institute placed the children, ages 1 to 5 years old, in housing containing high levels of lead and lead dust, but did not warn parents. Instead, the suit alleges, they kept that information quiet in order to measure the children’s blood to determine lead levels during abatement. The suit also charges that the Institute not only told parents their apartments were safe from lead contamination, but worked with landlords to secure public financing for lead abatement.

During the two-year period that each child was studied, the children received no medical treatment, even when some of the children’s blood lead levels were registering two-and-half times above an accepted blood lead level.

The Kennedy Krieger Institute is a research and patient care facility for children, which is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins was not named in the suit.

This unfortunate situation underscores the importance of testing homes, apartments and businesses for lead-based paint and lead dust. Today, 33 years after lead paint was banned, children are still being poisoned by lead and lead dust. This is not just an inner city problem; lead-based paint is still present in virtually every home built before 1978. And parents, just like those in Baltimore, have no clue their home contains lead, which may be lurking under layers of other paint. Each time the paint is disturbed – during renovation work or by simply opening or closing a window – lead dust can be released.

For more information on lead, click here.

 

Each year mold destroys more wood than all the fires and termites combined. (Luke Armstrong, 2016)
charles morgan profile picture
charles morgan
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
John was great. Explained everything along the way. Took 9 samples. Look forward to getting full report
Posted on Google Google
leo pasten profile picture
leo pasten
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Excellent services from the beginning to the performance of the test. Thanks for all the time spent in our job. John and Oscar we are very grateful. Leo
Posted on Google Google
R R (RR) profile picture
R R (RR)
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Tom was extremely helpful, informative, thorough, and polite. Thank you!
Posted on Google Google
Angela Welcome profile picture
Angela Welcome
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The expert was prompt and extremely o knowledgeable. He explained every step as he performed the test. Also gave good tips on cleaning the air and safe products.
Posted on Google Google
Heather Sherman profile picture
Heather Sherman
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Our tech was very knowledgeable and explained everything to us regarding his assessment in a way that was way to understand.
Posted on Google Google
Mike McCready profile picture
Mike McCready
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ron was knowledgeable, professional, and explained things very clearly.
Posted on Google Google
Matt Wang profile picture
Matt Wang
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ron was very thorough and knowledgeable - we appreciated his expertise, demeanor, and professionalism. Would call again
Posted on Google Google
Carol Dominick profile picture
Carol Dominick
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Tom was great! On time, professional . Cant say enough about him. Many thanks
Posted on Google Google
Kevin Corbin profile picture
Kevin Corbin
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great guy, professional and social.
Posted on Google Google

Please follow and like us:

How RTK Environmental Group keeps you safe while we’re in your home or workplace.

Watch Video Below

Memberships